IELTS Essay: Online Learning

Nowadays, distance-learning programs have gained popularity, but some people argue that online courses can never be taken as well as those taken at a college or university in person.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The rise in popularity of online-learning software and applications has led many to argue they can be as effective as real-life lessons taken at university. In my opinion, though these lessons are more efficient in particular university situations, their overall efficacy is far lower than learning in person.

Proponents of the online study point out how increased flexibility leads to greater efficiency. When students study in person, they must expend time traveling to and from class and waiting before and after the lesson. In the aggregate, this constitutes significant time lost. This time could be redirected to more studying or other tasks. For instance, a student studying online could finish assignments up until the minute class begins and quickly begin their homework after the lesson. However, the efficiency gained is largely hypothetical as most students are likely to become distracted during online lessons and waste much of the time saved online.

Moreover, in-person lessons are far more engaging than online ones. This was clearly evidenced during the recent Covid-19 pandemic when many schools, including universities, transitioned to online learning for a period of time. The results were that students were generally less engaged in lessons and their overall productivity and learning suffered. This counterintuitive loss of productivity can be explained not only by the potential distractions students are vulnerable to online but also by the lack of connection between learners and teachers. In a classroom setting, students personally interact with their professors and other students, guaranteeing a high level of engagement and memorability.

In conclusion, though there are reasons to argue for the potential time saved through online lessons, they are simply far less effective than real-world classes. Online lessons should remain a niche element of university education.

 

IELTS Essay topic: Analysis

1. The rise in popularity of online-learning software and applications has led many to argue they can be as effective as real-life lessons taken at university. 2. In my opinion, though these lessons are more efficient in particular university situations, their overall efficacy is far lower than learning in person.

  1. Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
  2. Write a clear opinion. Read more about introductions here.

1. Proponents of the online study point out how increased flexibility leads to greater efficiency. 2. When students study in person, they must expend time traveling to and from class and waiting before and after the lesson. 3. In the aggregate, this constitutes significant time lost. This time could be redirected to more studying or other tasks. 4. For instance, a student studying online could finish assignments up until the minute class begins and quickly begin their homework after the lesson. 5. However, the efficiency gained is largely hypothetical as most students are likely to become distracted during online lessons and waste much of the time saved online.

  1. Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
  2. Explain your main idea.
  3. Develop it with specific or hypothetical examples.
  4. Keep developing it fully.
  5. You might add a counterpoint here.

1. Moreover, in-person lessons are far more engaging than online ones. 2. This was clearly evidenced during the recent Covid-19 pandemic when many schools, including universities, transitioned to online learning for a period of time. 3. The results were that students were generally less engaged in lessons and their overall productivity and learning suffered. 4. This counterintuitive loss of productivity can be explained not only by the potential distractions students are vulnerable to online but also by the lack of connection between learners and teachers. 5. In a classroom setting, students personally interact with their professors and other students, guaranteeing a high level of engagement and memorability.

  1. Write a new topic sentence with a new main idea at the end.
  2. Explain your new main idea.
  3. Include specific details and examples.
  4. Add as much information as you can and make sure it links logically.
  5. Continue your development.

1. In conclusion, though there are reasons to argue for the potential time saved through online lessons, they are simply far less effective than real-world classes. 2. Online lessons should remain a niche element of university education.

  1. Summarise your main ideas.
  2. Include a final thought. Read more about conclusions here.

IELTS Essay topic: Vocabulary

What do the words in bold below mean? Make some notes on paper to aid memory and then check below.

The rise in popularity of online-learning software and applications has led many to argue they can be as effective as real-life lessons taken at university. In my opinion, though these lessons are more efficient in particular university situations, their overall efficacy is far lower than learning in person.

Proponents of the online study point out how increased flexibility leads to greater efficiency. When students study in person, they must expend time traveling to and from class and waiting before and after the lessonIn the aggregate, this constitutes significant time lost. This time could be redirected to more studying or other tasks. For instance, a student studying online could finish assignments up until the minute class begins and quickly begin their homework after the lesson. However, the efficiency gained is largely hypothetical as most students are likely to become distracted during online lessons and waste much of the time saved online.

Moreover, in-person lessons are far more engaging than online ones. This was clearly evidenced during the recent Covid-19 pandemic when many schools, including universities, transitioned to online learning for a period of time. The results were that students were generally less engaged in lessons and their overall productivity and learning suffered. This counterintuitive loss of productivity can be explained not only by the potential distractions students are vulnerable to online but also by the lack of connection between learners and teachers. In a classroom setting, students personally interact with their professors and other students, guaranteeing high level of engagement and memorability.

In conclusion, though there are reasons to argue for the potential time saved through online lessons, they are simply far less effective than real-world classes. Online lessons should remain a niche element of university education.

 

Answers

  • For extra practice, write an antonym (opposite word) on a piece of paper to help you remember the new vocabulary:
  • The rise in popularity of online-learning software and applications using apps like Zoom more often
  • argue point out
  • as effective as real-life lessons taken at university just as good as the classes in college
  • efficient saving time and money
  • particular university situations some cases
  • overall efficacy is far lower than learning in person and generally worse than learning in real life
  • Proponents of the online study point out how increased flexibility leads to greater efficiency supporters of remote learning argue it is more convenient and saves time and energy
  • expend time traveling to and from waste time commuting
  • waiting before and after the lesson hanging out before and after classes
  • In the aggregate combined
  • constitutes significant time lost combined with all the time not used
  • redirected put in a different direction
  • tasks assignments
  • finish assignments up until the minute class begins do work right until class starts
  • quickly begin their homework after the lesson and do homework as soon as class ends
  • gained what you get
  • largely hypothetical just imaginary
  • distracted during online lessons not paying attention during classes online
  • waste much of the time saved online not productively using your time
  • in-person lessons studying in real life
  • This was clearly evidenced during the recent Covid-19 pandemic when the clearest example of this was during the Coronavirus pandemic
  • transitioned to moved to
  • for a period of time over some time
  • results consequences
  • generally less engaged in overall not as interested in
  • overall productivity and learning suffered general efficiency and learning got worse
  • counterintuitive not what you would assume, and not logical
  • can be explained not only by the potential distractions students are vulnerable to online but also by there’s explanation that students might be wasting time online and not paying attention
  • lack of connection between not much link to
  • In a classroom setting in classes
  • personally interact with them in person and communicate with
  • guaranteeing to safeguard
  • high level of engagement and memorability makes it more interesting and easy to remember
  • argue for the potential time saved through point out it saves time
  • far less effective than real-world classes and much less valuable than in-person lessons
  • remain a niche element keep it a small part of the course
  • a university education learning at college

Error: Contact form not found.